ArticleMedical physics2026
Multi-contrast X-ray microtomography of human lung specimens with an extended field-of-view.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-destructive three-dimensional structural assessment of transbronchial cryobiopsy specimens using phase-contrast X-ray CT: a proof-of-concept study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Multi-contrast X-ray microtomography of human lung specimens with an extended field-of-view.Medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhase-based X-ray microtomography is a powerful technique capable of quantitative volumetric imaging of lung tissue in health and disease. The maximum sample size is however limited by the fixed sizes of detectors and optical elements. Thus while high-resolution imaging can offer valuable microscale insights, it can be difficult to interpret without the context of the surrounding tissue. We propose a multi-contrast and multi-scale approach, combined with an offset geometry to extend the field-of-view (FOV). PURPOSE: FOV limitations make it a challenge to simultaneously achieve high spatial-resolution and image large samples. Our method doubles the possible FOV achievable for a given spatial-resolution, in a way compatible with multiple scales and imaging systems.
methodsMulti-contrast whole sample volumetric images are acquired using a beam-tracking X-ray phase-contrast imaging(XPCI) system. Following this, a section of the same sample is imaged at higher resolution using an X-ray microscope with propagation-based imaging. The FOV of both methods is doubled using an offset center-of-rotation geometry, followed by weighted analytical reconstruction.
resultsWe present exemplary multi-contrast reconstructions of resected human lung tissue at 10.5
conclusionsWe demonstrate a versatile method to image large samples without sacrificing spatial-resolution. This method is directly compatible with complementary implementations of XPCI, and is easily adapted to a range of other systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.