ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Design and implementation of an AAPM volunteer database for advancing global medical physics initiatives.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to assess American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) members' availability to volunteer, share their expertise, and promote global collaboration in medical physics by partnering with international colleagues who seek support in strengthening their medical physics practice.
methodsThe questionnaire was administered to AAPM members to assess their willingness to volunteer, preferred engagement modalities, and availability for different types of volunteer activities. The questionnaire was integrated into the AAPM member profile and covered therapy, diagnostic, and nuclear medicine disciplines, capturing participants' visiting preferences and expertise in teaching and training. Respondents were categorized based on demographic factors such as years of experience, expertise areas, and geographic location.
resultsA total of 409 AAPM members completed and submitted 427 responses to the questionnaire (18 members submitted two discipline-specific sets). The 4% response rate confines this report to exploratory findings rather than predictive conclusions for all AAPM members. Most respondents expressed a preference for short-term engagements, with 49.2% favoring visits of less than one week. Volunteers reported significant expertise, with a substantial portion having more than 15 years of professional experience. Additionally, respondents demonstrated active participation in international activities, with 57 engaged in AAPM initiatives and over 100 involved in private nonprofit or nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).
conclusionsThis report highlights the breadth of expertise and willingness of AAPM members to collaborate and support education across all specialties, contributing to the advancement of global medical physics. While the volunteer data shows significant experience and expertise, targeted recruitment is needed in certain specialized areas. This initiative offers a scalable and sustainable model for global volunteerism in medical physics, complementing traditional in person training and addressing the needs of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.