ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2026
Explorative research on image quantification methods for setup conditions and quality control of ultrasound devices in thyroid ultrasonography.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study explored the quantitative analysis of portable ultrasound devices using target images from Multipurpose Phantom N-365. It focused on identifying inter-device variability and time-dependent degradation of the devices and their probes to support standardization and quality control of ultrasound devices.
methodsThree ultrasound device models were assessed, with two different setup conditions for each model. Three types of phantom targets, i.e., cyst-like, colloid cyst-like, and nodule-like, were collected from circular grayscale targets. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of brightness were calculated for each target type.
resultsQuantification of the mean and SD values of target brightness effectively distinguished between ultrasound devices due to the aging of the ultrasound equipment. Multivariate analysis further revealed that both the probes and the main unit independently contributed to time-related changes.
conclusionThis article presents a novel method for ensuring rigorous quality control and promoting standardization in ultrasound examinations by quantifying phantom image characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41712173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.