ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
Outcomes of individual DOACs vs. VKAs in AF patients with frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating Anticoagulation Decisions in Atrial Fibrillation and Frailty Comorbidity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) patients with frailty represent a particularly complex and medically vulnerable population. These patients are simultaneously at increased risk for ischemic stroke and bleeding complications, complicating decisions around anticoagulant therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to evaluate the comparative safety and efficacy of individual direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in AF patients with frailty.
methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL for studies published to July 2, 2024. Included studies compared individual DOACs to VKAs in AF patients with frailty. Outcomes were stroke/systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.
resultsA total of six studies (one randomized trial and five cohort studies) met inclusion criteria, encompassing 272,545 patients (108,666 treated with VKAs and 163,879 with DOACs). Among DOAC-treated patients, 62,961 were treated with apixaban, 21,954 with dabigatran, 10,813 with edoxaban and 68,151 with rivaroxaban. Of the six included studies, four reported stroke or systemic embolism in patients taking apixaban, five reported this outcome for dabigatran, four for edoxaban, and five for rivaroxaban. Four studies reported major bleeding in patients taking apixaban, five reported major bleeding for dabigatran, four for edoxaban, and five for rivaroxaban. Among DOACs, apixaban was associated with significant reductions in SSE (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.95, p = 0.03) and major bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29–0.95, p = 0.03) compared with VKAs. Other DOACs demonstrated numerical trends toward reduced SSE and major bleeding but did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that apixaban is associated with a more favorable safety and efficacy profile than VKAs in AF patients with frailty. This analysis supports the preferential use of apixaban in this population, while highlighting the need for individualized risk assessment and clinical judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41712168What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.