ReviewFolia microbiologica2026
Microbial exopolysaccharides in environmental remediation: production, mechanisms, and challenges.
Review in Folia microbiologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial exopolysaccharides (EPS) are increasingly recognized as effective, biodegradable, and low-toxicity biomaterials for the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated environments. Their high metal-binding capacity, chemical tunability, and microbial renewability make EPS attractive alternatives to conventional physicochemical adsorbents. Although numerous studies have reported the application of EPS in the removal of heavy metals and other toxic pollutants, existing literature remains fragmented, with limited integration of EPS production pathways, structure-function relationships, comparative adsorption performance and limited guidance on scalable production strategies. A key contribution is a consolidated comparative analysis of adsorption capacities of EPS, derived from different microbial taxa against major heavy metals, enabling informed selection of high-performing EPS systems for remediation applications. Furthermore, the review systematically categorizes the major metabolic pathways involved in EPS biosynthesis and identifies key microorganisms utilizing these pathways, highlighting regulatory factors influencing EPS yield and composition. Special emphasis is placed on bioreactor-based EPS production strategies, including batch, fed-batch, and continuous systems, and their role in improving productivity, consistency, and scalability. Emerging approaches such as EPS-based nanocomposites, hybrid materials, and bioengineered microbial systems are also discussed as promising solutions to overcome these limitations. This article provides a comprehensive and critical synthesis of microbial EPS in environmental remediation, focusing on their biosynthesis pathways, physicochemical characteristics, and adsorption mechanisms governing pollutant sequestration. By integrating microbial physiology with performance-oriented remediation outcomes, this review identifies critical bottlenecks and future research priorities required to advance microbial EPS from laboratory demonstrations toward cost-effective and scalable environmental remediation technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41712135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.