ReviewPrimates; journal of primatology2026
(Re)Integrating classical natural history approaches into contemporary field primatology: toward a more holistic understanding of primates.
Review in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The historical evolution of the natural sciences, from natural history to specialized scientific disciplines, has fundamentally altered how we study the natural world. While scientific specialization has undoubtedly brought both depth and rigor to specific scientific fields, including primatology, it has also created methodological limitations that fragment our understanding of complex primate ecosystems. This paper outlines four core principles, once central to natural history research, that are less commonly applied in contemporary primatology. These principles include: multidisciplinarity, democratized participation, integration of subjective interpretation, and creative communication. I argue for the strategic integration and/or reintegration of these principles within primatology and provide concrete recommendations for institutional enactment. However, while the incorporation of these selected principles may make the field more inclusive, ethical, and diverse, it is critical to also acknowledge that many other aspects of natural history have been historically rooted in a colonialism, racism, and exploitation. This paper, therefore, does not call for a blind return to natural history approaches as they were once practiced, but rather for the development of a new, holistic, next-generation primatology. Rather than abandoning scientific rigor, this synthesis approach would expand primatology's methodological toolkit to better reflect the interconnected nature of primate worlds while bridging the gap between academic and local knowledge systems. Such integration offers pathways toward more inclusive, comprehensive, and ultimately more effective primate research and conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.