Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712078›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2026

Healthcare applications of 0-1 neural networks in prescriptive problems with observational data.

Vrishabh Patil, Kara K Hoppe, Yonatan Mintz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vrishabh PatilTepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kara K HoppeMaternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1010 Mound Street, 53715, Madison, WI, USA.
Yonatan MintzIndustrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1513 University Avenue, 53706, Madison, WI, USA. ymintz@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0670-1794

Funding

ObGyn Start-Up-UWF-SMPH Research and Development AAB8581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key challenge in medical decision making is learning treatment policies for patients with limited observational data. This challenge is particularly evident in personalized healthcare decision-making, where models need to take into account the intricate relationships between patient characteristics, treatment options, and health outcomes. To address this, we introduce prescriptive neural networks (PNNs), shallow 0-1 neural networks trained with mixed integer programming that can be used with counterfactual estimation to optimize policies in medium data settings. These models offer greater interpretability than deep neural networks and can encode more complex policies than common models such as decision trees. We show that PNNs can outperform existing methods in both synthetic data experiments and in a case study of assigning treatments for postpartum hypertension. In particular, PNNs are shown to produce policies that could reduce peak blood pressure by 5.47 mm Hg (p=0.02) over existing clinical practice, and by 2 mm Hg (p=0.01) over the next best prescriptive modeling technique. Moreover PNNs were more likely than all other models to correctly identify clinically significant features while existing models relied on potentially dangerous features such as patient insurance information and race that could lead to bias in treatment.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerFemaleHumansHypertensionCausal inferenceData scarcityInterpretabilityMixed-integer programmingNeural networksPersonalized healthcarePrescriptive trees

Identifiers

PMID41712078
PMCPMC12920400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.