ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Artificial intelligence in the recognition of stages in live laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated surgical phase recognition and analysis in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using artificial intelligence.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for treating symptomatic gallstones. Despite established safety strategies, variability in their adoption leads to inconsistent outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential for real-time recognition of procedural stages, contributing to surgical standardization and safety. A prospective observational study was conducted between February 2023 and March 2024. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones or class 1 cholecystitis (Tokyo classification) were included. From 141 surgical videos, 131 were used to extract 1,841 annotated images representing seven predefined stages: cavity entry, port placement, gallbladder traction, dissection, clipping and sectioning, specimen removal, and final checking. A ResNet-50 neural network was trained and validated using a 90/10 split. Performance was evaluated on 10 unseen videos and tested live in 10 surgeries, comparing AI stage detection with expert surgical judgment. Validation accuracy ranged from 80.15 to 91.74%. In live testing, the system achieved 100% agreement with expert surgeons. The dissection phase was consistently the longest. Real-time processing speed ranged from 1 to 2 frames per second. AI-based recognition of laparoscopic cholecystectomy stages is feasible and demonstrates high concordance with expert evaluation. This approach may support procedural standardization and improve intraoperative decision-making. Further multicenter validation is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41712068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.