Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712068›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Artificial intelligence in the recognition of stages in live laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Sean Olivieri, Enrique Petracchi, Hugo Zandalazini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean OlivieriGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich, Pi y Margall 750, C1155AHD, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Dr.OlivieriSean@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3658-0499
Enrique PetracchiGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich, Pi y Margall 750, C1155AHD, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-4656
Hugo ZandalaziniGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich, Pi y Margall 750, C1155AHD, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7655-2416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for treating symptomatic gallstones. Despite established safety strategies, variability in their adoption leads to inconsistent outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential for real-time recognition of procedural stages, contributing to surgical standardization and safety. A prospective observational study was conducted between February 2023 and March 2024. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones or class 1 cholecystitis (Tokyo classification) were included. From 141 surgical videos, 131 were used to extract 1,841 annotated images representing seven predefined stages: cavity entry, port placement, gallbladder traction, dissection, clipping and sectioning, specimen removal, and final checking. A ResNet-50 neural network was trained and validated using a 90/10 split. Performance was evaluated on 10 unseen videos and tested live in 10 surgeries, comparing AI stage detection with expert surgical judgment. Validation accuracy ranged from 80.15 to 91.74%. In live testing, the system achieved 100% agreement with expert surgeons. The dissection phase was consistently the longest. Real-time processing speed ranged from 1 to 2 frames per second. AI-based recognition of laparoscopic cholecystectomy stages is feasible and demonstrates high concordance with expert evaluation. This approach may support procedural standardization and improve intraoperative decision-making. Further multicenter validation is recommended.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBile duct injuryCholecystectomyDeep learningLaparoscopicMinimally invasive surgeryPhase recognition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.