Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712053›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2026

Assessing Motivation for Condom Use Among MSM: Effort Discounting as a Novel Measure of Sexual Risk.

Peter Luehring-Jones, Tibor P Palfai, Jeffrey S Simons, Stephen A Maisto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter Luehring-JonesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. pluehrin@bu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2427-6530
Tibor P PalfaiDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-5203
Jeffrey S SimonsDepartment of Psychology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4596-5805
Stephen A MaistoDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5470-102X

Funding

NIAAA NIH HHS 5R01 AA022301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among men who have sex with men (MSM), motivation for condom use in sexual situations varies as a function of trait-level characteristics and state-level contextual factors. To-date, however, condom use motivation has been assessed in cross-sectional research designs by single use, questionnaire-based self-report measures. This study describes the development and validation of a novel sexual effort discounting task that was designed to rapidly assess individual differences in motivation for condom use by measuring how much effort a participant would invest into acquiring a condom prior to engaging in anal intercourse with a partner of unknown HIV and STI status. The task was repeatedly administered as part of an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study of condom use motivation to a pilot group of 55 MSM who regularly engaged in risky sexual behavior. Results demonstrated good reliability across administrations, and validity was supported by significant longitudinal associations with daily fluctuations in motivation to use condoms, significant correlations with self-reported sexual behavior, condom use, and cognitions related to condom use (e.g., intentions to use condoms), and significant positive associations with performance on a newly-developed EMA version of the well-established Sexual Delay Discounting Task (Johnson and Bruner in Drug Alcohol Depend 123:15-21, 2012). Use of the novel sexual effort discounting task may allow for greater insight into how differing levels of motivation for condom use may impact sexual decision-making among MSM, both in terms of indexing individual differences in motivation for condom use and assessing the impact of changing contextual variables on motivation in repeated-measures research designs.

Indexed as

CondomsHomosexuality, MaleMotivationRisk-TakingSafe SexSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEcological Momentary AssessmentHIV InfectionsHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesCondom useEcological momentary assessmentEffort discountingMen who have sex with menMotivation

Identifiers

PMID41712053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.