ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Assessing the effect of Bacillus rugosus NM007 as a novel probiotic strain on growth performance, hemato-biochemical profile, immune response, digestive enzymes and intestinal histomorphology of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Invisible Balance: How Prebiotics and Probiotics Can Support Fish Health and Development.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Janus Face ofVeterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the growing global demand for seafood, sustainable aquaculture requires enhancing fish health and feed efficiency while reducing the environmental impact. The current study evaluated the potential probiotics of Bacillus rugosus NM007 in farmed Nile tilapia. Three different doses of B. rugosus NM007 supplemented feed, namely 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 g/kg, were fed to fish (5.13 ± 0.09 g, N = 240) in triplicate and assigned as T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.