ArticleCell and tissue banking2026
Optimization of the microbiological quality control validation of corneal medium using a clinical C. acnes isolate.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The microbiological quality of corneal tissue for transplantation must be monitored in a validated procedure complying with the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.). An automated culture system is used to detect test strains in the presence of the medium. The Ph. Eur. mentioned C. acnes ATCC 11827 strain has allegedly been isolated from skin. This strain is known to display variable growth in routine matrix validation. As the Ph. Eur. also opens the use of clinical isolates, this study analyzed the use of clinical isolates for matrix validation.We compared the time-to-detection (TTD) in absence and presence of cornea organ culture medium (cocm) of 24 C. acnes strains, preferring clinical isolates, in an automated culture system.In the first step clinical strains (n=23) were examined, thus 4 slow-growing (TTD 305,1-336 h), 5 intermediate-fast-growing (TTD 250,1-305 h), 5 fast-growing strains (TTD 164,3-250 h) and nine non-blood-culture-detectable strains (TTD>336 h) were identified. Seven strains showed a reproducible growth signal in cocm-absence. In presence of cocm, three strains (CA02, CA10, CA22) showed a reproducible growth signal, while the reference strain was not blood-culture-detectable (bcd) in four of five experiments. The strain with the preferred growth characteristics (DSM 117854) was tested according to the Ph. Eur. conditions and showed bcd growth in all measurements (n=5) in presence of medium, in contrast to the reference strain.The use of a clinical isolate of C. acnes could improve matrix validation of cocm quality control testing and thus the care of cornea-transplant-patients. C. acnes DSM 117854 provides an isolate that promises more reliable results in matrix validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.