ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026
Strategies for optimizing clinical trial recruitment: perspectives among patients with breast cancer.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization of stakeholder engagement to inform the identification of leading indicators for clinical research enrollment performance in a large integrated health care system: The VA clinical research enrollment summit.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Tailoring an auricular point acupressure self-management program for chronic pain: lessons learned from rural partners.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite the critical role of clinical trials in advancing cancer treatment, patient enrollment remains low at less than 10% with various health system-, provider-, and patient-level barriers [1]. This study explored perspectives of patients with breast cancer receiving treatment who declined clinical trial participation to work towards developing more effective, patient-centered recruitment strategies.
methodsThis qualitative study enrolled patients who were offered participation in a breast cancer clinical trial yet declined to participate from August 2023 to March 2024. Semi-structured interviews were used to elucidate patient perspectives on the clinical trial recruitment process. An open coding scheme was used to identify major themes present throughout the transcribed interviewers. Two independent reviewers then coded using NVivo 14 software with a third reviewer to settle any discrepancies.
resultsOf the 21 female patients interviewed, 43% had previously declined enrollment onto a therapeutic clinical trial and 57% a non-therapeutic clinical trial. Three core themes regarding patient-suggested strategies to optimize clinical trial recruitment emerged: (1) improving communication with patients (e.g., ensuring presentation of key information, timing of recruitment, manner of information delivery, provider involvement), (2) increasing accessibility/availability of resources to address logistical burdens (e.g., ride-share, telehealth, compensation), and (3) leveraging media in recruitment platforms.
conclusionsThis study highlights critical areas for optimization of clinical trial recruitment offering strategies such as the use of lay patient navigators, physician/researcher recruitment training in communication and implicit biases, and mixed/online recruitment. This feedback can better inform more patient centric recruitment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.