Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711965›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026

Strategies for optimizing clinical trial recruitment: perspectives among patients with breast cancer.

Mandy Chen, Nicole Reh, Sindhu R Dwarampudi, Courtney P Williams, Nicole Henderson, Gabrielle B Rocque, Lily Gutnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mandy ChenHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA. mandy07@uab.edu.
Nicole RehHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Sindhu R DwarampudiMedical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA.
Courtney P WilliamsDivision of General Internal Medicine & Population Science, Birmingham, USA.
Nicole HendersonO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, USA.
Gabrielle B RocqueO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, USA.
Lily GutnikO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the critical role of clinical trials in advancing cancer treatment, patient enrollment remains low at less than 10% with various health system-, provider-, and patient-level barriers [1]. This study explored perspectives of patients with breast cancer receiving treatment who declined clinical trial participation to work towards developing more effective, patient-centered recruitment strategies.

methodsThis qualitative study enrolled patients who were offered participation in a breast cancer clinical trial yet declined to participate from August 2023 to March 2024. Semi-structured interviews were used to elucidate patient perspectives on the clinical trial recruitment process. An open coding scheme was used to identify major themes present throughout the transcribed interviewers. Two independent reviewers then coded using NVivo 14 software with a third reviewer to settle any discrepancies.

resultsOf the 21 female patients interviewed, 43% had previously declined enrollment onto a therapeutic clinical trial and 57% a non-therapeutic clinical trial. Three core themes regarding patient-suggested strategies to optimize clinical trial recruitment emerged: (1) improving communication with patients (e.g., ensuring presentation of key information, timing of recruitment, manner of information delivery, provider involvement), (2) increasing accessibility/availability of resources to address logistical burdens (e.g., ride-share, telehealth, compensation), and (3) leveraging media in recruitment platforms.

conclusionsThis study highlights critical areas for optimization of clinical trial recruitment offering strategies such as the use of lay patient navigators, physician/researcher recruitment training in communication and implicit biases, and mixed/online recruitment. This feedback can better inform more patient centric recruitment strategies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicPatient ParticipationPatient SelectionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchBreast cancerClinical trial enrollmentClinical trial recruitmentPatient perspective

Identifiers

PMID41711965
PMCPMC12920276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.