ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2026
Molecular identification of Bartonella henselae in dogs with clinical suspicion of visceral leishmaniasis.
Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genus Bartonella includes species responsible for severe infections. Bartonella henselae, commonly linked to human disease, also infects dogs with or without symptoms. In Brazil, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by Leishmania infantum is prevalent in Mato Grosso State, Brazil, particularly in Rondonopolis city, affecting both humans and dogs. Although reports of co-infection with Bartonella spp. and L. infantum exist in other countries, Brazilian studies are scarce. This study investigates the presence of B. henselae using culture and molecular methods in dogs suspected of having VL in Rondonopolis, while also assessing potential co-infections and evaluating diagnostic limitations of VL. Results showed B. henselae DNA in 53.75% (43/80) of these dogs, with Leishmania spp. DNA found in 65.11% (28/43) of them. Of the 80 dogs, 43.75% (35) lacked VL serological confirmation, yet 48.57% (17/35) were positive for B. henselae. This is the first report of B. henselae bacteremia in dogs from Rondonopolis. The high occurrence of dogs with clinical VL suggests a need for further research to understand the bacterium's role in VL-suspected cases, regardless of diagnostic confirmation. The study highlights a significant finding: approximately half of the dogs suspected of zoonotic parasitosis, with or without serological confirmation, were infected with B. henselae. Additionally, the detection of Leishmania sp. DNA in dogs not confirmed by Brazil's Health Department serological criteria suggests that these diagnostic standards may need reevaluation by health authorities, though caution is warranted due to the limitations of blood-based PCR for Leishmania sp. detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.