ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
Resource recovery from low-rank coal and livestock manure for sustainable agroecosystems: a review.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein profiling and GC-MS product analysis provide insights into lignite solubilization and bioconversion by Lysinibacillus sphaericus strain SH19.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- From coal biodesulfurization to mine-soil remediation: a critical review of microbial sulfur transformation in coal-impacted environments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mining and combustion of low-rank coal (LRC), in conjunction with the inadequate management of agricultural waste, notably cattle manure, constitutes a substantial environmental challenge, encompassing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and resource inefficiency. However, the co-utilization of these materials offers opportunities for sustainable waste valorization. This review identifies critical knowledge gaps and evaluates recent advances in the combination of LRC and manure for co-composting and bioresource recovery. The findings from the literature review suggest that microbial biodegradation and surfactant-assisted treatments can enhance the transformation of LRC into humic substances, whereas anaerobic digestion and composting can reduce methane emissions from manure. The co-composting of LRC and manure has been identified as a promising pathway to improve soil fertility and carbon sequestration, while mitigating GHG emissions. The present review aims to evaluate microbial, surfactant-assisted, and co-composting strategies for LRC and manure management, with emphasis on agricultural sustainability and climate mitigation. Nevertheless, challenges remain regarding process optimisation, scalability, and economic feasibility. The review concludes with a series of recommendations for future research aimed at integrating these biotechnologies into circular agricultural-energy systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.