ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2026
Brazilian version of the Cognitive Risk Profile for Pain Scale: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation.
Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Cognitive Risk Profile for Pain (CRPP) scale for Brazilians with chronic pain.
methodsWe conducted a questionnaire-based validation study. Patients (males and females) with pain in any part of the body for > 3 months were included (n = 191). The participants were assessed using the CRPP scale, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale (PCTS), and the Brunel Mood Scale (BRUMS). After the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the CRPP scale, we tested for ceiling or floor effects, construct validity, reliability, and internal consistency. Finally, the second application of the CRPP scale was used to measure test-retest reliability.
resultsMost participants were female, over 36 years of age, overweight, physically active, and had an average pain history of approximately 41 months. No ceiling or floor effects are observed. Nine domains of the CRPP scale correlated with the NPRS score, two domains of the HADS and PCTS, and six domains of the BRUMS. All CRPP domains demonstrated adequate reliability and internal consistency.
conclusionThe Brazilian version of the CRPP scale demonstrated adequate measurement properties in patients with chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.