ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
[Suicidal ideation in urban workers in a large municipality, Bahia State, Brazil].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the association between psychosocial aspects of work, socioeconomic factors, and global dissatisfaction with suicidal ideation in workers in a large municipality. This cross-sectional study was carried out with data from the second wave of a prospective cohort with a population aged 15 years or older who lived in the urban area of a large municipality in Bahia, Brazil. A structured questionnaire on sociodemographic, work, and leisure data was applied. Occupational stressors were investigated by the Effort-Reward Imbalance and Job Content Questionnaire, global dissatisfaction was measured by WHOQOL-BREF indicators, and suicidal ideation was evaluated by item 17 of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was processed and complex samples were weighted. Ideation frequency in the 1,629 studied workers totaled 5%, showing strong, significant, and directed direct effects with global dissatisfaction (β = 0.72) and a medium one for the high emotional demand of work (β = 0.27). The female gender, lower monthly income, absence of leisure activities, excessive commitment to work, and high emotional demand showed significant indirect effects (mediated by global dissatisfaction). The paths in this study evince a chain of events that, mediated by feelings of dissatisfaction, make workers vulnerable and make them suffer. This set of factors potentiates suicidal ideation and makes them consider suicide as an alternative that will stop their suffering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.