Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711849›Full record

ReviewArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2026

Uterus transplantation - indications, technique, and results.

Wellington Andraus, Dani Ejsenberg, Daniel Reis Waisberg, Alexandre Chagas Santana, Liliana Ducatti, Rubens Macedo Arantes, Rodrigo Bronze de Martino, Vinicius Rocha Santos, Rafael Soares Pinheiro, Luciana Leis and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for prediction of uterine rejection in a patient submitted to live-donor uterus transplantation.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Wellington AndrausUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5162-138X
Dani EjsenbergUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-1230
Daniel Reis WaisbergUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4284-0633
Alexandre Chagas SantanaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-6481
Liliana DucattiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-4974
Rubens Macedo ArantesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5505-6480
Rodrigo Bronze de MartinoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5343-5057
Vinicius Rocha SantosUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2643-6094
Rafael Soares PinheiroUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8632-3529
Luciana LeisUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9770-8593
Maciana Santos SilvaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2627-7839
Luciana Bertocco HaddadUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0202-9037
José Maria Soares JuniorUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-9404
Pedro Augusto Araujo MonteleoneUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0570-5969
Edmund Chada BaracatUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0111-9030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

central messageUterus transplantation was a transformative innovation in reproductive medicine and organ transplantation in general, and an alternative for the treatment of infertility. The problem of infertility affects 8-12% of the population of reproductive age, causing an enormous social impact. Uterus transplantation, a relatively new treatment, has emerged as an excellent option for couples with absolute uterine infertility. The first uterus transplant performed was in 2000, in Saudi Arabia. At this same time, a Swedish researcher began several experimental works with uterine transplantation in different animal models. Only more than a decade after the first attempt in humans was a second case performed, in Turkey, in 2011. The first transplant in the Americas was performed in the United States of America, in 2016, with a deceased donor. In the same year, in Brazil, the group from Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, performed the first uterus transplant in Latin America, also with a deceased donor. This Brazilian case resulted in the world's first birth from a deceased donor uterus transplant in December 2017, making Brazil and Hospital das Clínicas in a vanguard position in the world transplant scenario. Even so, we have today more than 100 transplants performed on the planet, with the birth of more than 70 children. Uterus transplantation was a transformative innovation in reproductive medicine and organ transplantation. It is an alternative for the treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome is the main cause of uterine agenesis. This Brazilian case resulted in the world's first birth from a deceased donor uterus transplant in December 2017. Today, more than 100 transplants are performed on the planet, with the birth of more than 70 children. Uterus transplantation has undoubtedly been a transformative innovation in reproductive medicine and organ transplantation. It comes as an alternative for treating infertility of an absolute uterine cause. Among these causes, we have women who were born without this organ, or there was a need to perform a hysterectomy, or they have a non-functioning uterus, such as severe malformations (severe bicornuate uterus, Asherman syndrome). Modern society has increasingly respected each individual's decision, provided they are informed of all alternatives and risks involved. In this way, uterine transplantation has become an important alternative for patients with infertility due to uterine causes. PERSPECTIVES: Uterus transplantation is a new modality among organ transplants. It has undoubtedly brought great innovation and excellent results to the therapeutic armamentarium for infertility of uterine cause. Uterus transplantation is a great example where multidisciplinarity, in which each one contributes with their expertise, enables the realization of a greater feat. The gain of experience, technology, and minimally invasive surgeries will certainly bring even better results.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleOrgan TransplantationUterusFemaleHumansMullerian Ducts

Identifiers

PMID41711849
PMCPMC12922970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.