Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711805›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Structure function relationship of paracentral visual field impairment in myopic patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Kei Hasegawa, Kenji Suda, Tadamichi Akagi, Hanako Ohashi Ikeda, Takanori Kameda, Masahiro Miyake, Tomoko Hasegawa, Shogo Numa, Yasuyuki Oritani, Yuki Mori and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kei HasegawaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Kenji SudaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. qwm04525@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-1636-0898
Tadamichi AkagiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Hanako Ohashi IkedaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Takanori KamedaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Masahiro MiyakeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Tomoko HasegawaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Shogo NumaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yasuyuki OritaniDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yuki MoriDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Akitaka TsujikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether paracentral visual field (VF) impairment in patients with glaucoma and concomitant myopia is attributable to myopic maculopathy or papillomacular bundle impairment.

methodsPatients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) who were able to complete both 24 − 2 and 10 − 2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) standard testing on the Humphrey visual field analyzer (HFA) were included. Myopia was defined as an ocular axial length (AL) of 25 mm or greater. VF regions were classified using a structure-function relationship map developed at our facility, and total deviation (TD) values in each region were compared between myopic and non-myopic groups using generalized estimating equations (GEE).

resultsA total of 179 eyes from 128 patients were included in the study. AL of the eyes was 25.50 ± 2.00 mm. The myopic group comprised 103 eyes, and the non-myopic group had 76 eyes. No significant difference was found between the two groups on HFA 24 − 2, but on HFA 10 − 2, the non-myopic group had significantly lower TD values in the upper VF area (–17.94 ± 10.8 dB vs. − 13.98 ± 10.36 dB, p = 0.013), while the myopic group had significantly lower TD values in the cecocentral VF area (–4.90 ± 5.55 dB vs. − 7.42 ± 7.91 dB, p = 0.017). Nonlinear relationships suggesting optic neuropathy were observed between corresponding TD values and retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses in the three VF regions.

conclusionsThe papillomacular bundle is likely to be impaired in POAG with an AL ≥ 25 mm.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureMyopiaVisual FieldsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetinal Ganglion CellsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVisual Field TestsAxial lengthMyopiaPrimary open-angle glaucomaStructure-function relationship mapVisual field

Identifiers

PMID41711805
PMCPMC13091879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.