Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711804›Full record

Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Simulated vs. real visual performance of an EDOF intraocular lens using adaptive optics technology.

Silvia Carrasco-Rojo, Luca Giacopinelli, Inas Baoud Ould Haddi, María García-Montero, Pedro Arriola-Villalobos, Nuria Garzón

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Halo Measurements in Simulated Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Silvia Carrasco-RojoDepartment Optometry and Vision, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-8394-8477
Luca GiacopinelliDepartment Optometry and Vision, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-9691-6492
Inas Baoud Ould HaddiDepartment Optometry and Vision, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. ibaoud@ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-2542-5131
María García-MonteroDepartment Optometry and Vision, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-1411
Pedro Arriola-VillalobosDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3573-0842
Nuria GarzónDepartment Optometry and Vision, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6162-0081

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2021-122486OA-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the predictive accuracy of an adaptive optics visual simulator (SimVis Gekko™) in replicating the optical performance of a nondiffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL), AcrySof® IQ Vivity™ (Alcon, Fort Worth, USA), prior to cataract surgery.

methodsProspective, single-center, observational, comparative study. A total of 16 eyes from 16 patients with early-stage cataract underwent simulation of the AcrySof® IQ Vivity™ IOL using the SimVis Gekko™ device prior to phacoemulsification. Postoperative outcomes were assessed 1 month after bilateral implantation of the IOL. Monocular defocus curves, visual acuity (VA) at far, intermediate and near distances, and contrast sensitivity were compared between the simulated and actual postoperative results. Correlation between VA and pupil size was analyzed.

resultsThe simulated defocus curve closely matched the postoperative performance, with VA differences of less than one line for vergences between − 1.50 D and + 1.00 D. The only point with more than 1 line of difference occurred at − 3.00 D. Simulated contrast sensitivity was slightly lower than postoperative values but followed a similar trend across spatial frequencies. Distance and intermediate visual acuity were significantly better postoperatively than under simulation, while near VA showed no significant differences. A significant Pearson correlation was found between pupil size and near visual acuity.

conclusionThe SimVis Gekko™ device demonstrated high accuracy in simulating the visual outcomes of the AcrySof® IQ Vivity™ IOL, suggesting it may be a valuable tool for preoperative patient counseling and personalized lens selection in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityDepth PerceptionLens Implantation, IntraocularOptics and PhotonicsPseudophakiaRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLenses, IntraocularMaleMiddle AgedPhacoemulsificationProspective StudiesAdaptative opticsExtended depth of focusIntraocular lensPresbyopiaVisual simulator

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.