ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
[Validity evidence of the Hospital Birth Satisfaction Scale using the Item Response Theory].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the objective of generating evidence of validity for a measure of the latent trait "level of satisfaction with childbirth", Item Response Theory (IRT) was used in a sample of 15,965 women who had hospital births in Brazil. Telephone interviews were conducted up to six months after childbirth with participants of the Birth in Brazil: National Survey into Labor and Birth in the five regions of the country. An 11-item questionnaire denominated the Hospital Childbirth Care Satisfaction Scale was used. The questions were incorporated into the IRT models, with Samejima's graded response model providing the best fit. The sample was randomly divided into dataset 1 (n = 7,982), adjusted using the graded response model, and dataset 2 (n = 7,983), for validation of the results. Reliability measures were Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and Spearman-Brown coefficient. Regarding construct validity, exploratory factor analysis of dataset 1 demonstrated a latent factor structure with three dimensions. The resulting structure was tested in dataset 2 using confirmatory factor analysis, obtaining a good fit of the model. Two items of the questionnaire were excluded from the measure for not discriminating the latent trait of interest. Thus, thefinal scale consisted of nine items. Based on IRT, a new version of the instrument with adequate psychometric properties was obtained. The associations between satisfaction with childbirth and external variables strengthen the validity of the scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.