ArticleESC heart failure2026
Residual congestion at discharge assessed by bioelectrical impedance and its prognostic value in acute heart failure: a multi-centre, prospective registry study.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Prognostic value of bioelectrical impedance analysis in heart failure: A systematic review of congestion assessment and clinical outcomes".American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionResidual congestion at discharge is an important risk factor for early readmission and mortality in acute heart failure (AHF); however, it is often underestimated. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of oedema index (EI) and phase angle (PA) from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in assessing residual congestion and predicting short-term outcomes in patients with AHF.
methodsA multi-centre registry database from the steady movement with innovating leadership for heart failure (HF) between 2019 and 2023 was analysed. EI and PA were measured using direct segmental multi-frequency BIA device. The worsening heart failure events (WHF) were defined as a composite of HF readmission and all-cause mortality at 90- and 180-days. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the EI and PA cut-off values. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess the associations between BIA parameters and clinical outcomes.
resultsA total of 600 patients were included, of whom 360 (60%) were male, with a median age of 72.1 years. Within 180 days, 63 patients (11%) experienced WHFs. EI (odds ratio [OR] 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-2.35 at 90 days, OR 1.76; CI 1.44-2.14 at 180 days, all P < .01) and PA (OR 0.93; CI 0.90-0.96 at 90 days, OR 0.94; CI 0.91-0.96 at 180 days, all P < .01) showed correlation in univariate analysis. EI ≥ 0.4 and PA < 4.5° were identified as prognostic thresholds for unfavourable outcomes, with predictive values of 75% (P < .01, sensitivity 83%, and specificity 56%), and 71% (P < .01, sensitivity 81%, and specificity 54%), respectively. Increased EI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.71; CI 1.26-2.31 at 90 days, aHR 1.64; CI 1.30-2.07 at 180 days, all P < .01) and decreased PA (aHR 0.91; CI 0.86-0.96 at 90 days, aHR 0.92; CI 0.89-0.97 at 180 days, all P < .01) were independently associated with WHFs. Based on the estimated cut-offs, when EI and PA were considered together to classify the high-risk BIA group (EI ≥ 0.4 and PA < 4.5°), the risk was apparently increased (aHR 6.79; CI 1.71-26.93 at 90 days, aHR 3.43; CI 1.41-8.32 at 180 days, all P < .05) compared with normal BIA (EI < 0.4 and PA ≥ 4.5°) group.
conclusionThe EI and PA measured at discharge independently predicted short-term WHFs in patients with AHF. The suggested thresholds for identifying patients at high-risk of residual congestion were EI ≥ 0.4 and PA < 4.5°. As a non-invasive and accessible modality, BIA holds promise as a complementary tool to established biomarkers for evaluating congestion at discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.