ArticleJournal of vision2026
The interaction of speed and time in biasing the perception of dynamically changing visual inputs.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perception of the duration of a visual stimulus is a very peculiar sensory experience built without dedicated sensors. Perhaps due to this distinctiveness, duration perception is often influenced by stimulus sensory features such as speed, temporal frequency, or stimulus contrast. For instance, stimulus speed is known to distort temporal judgments, with faster stimuli being perceived as lasting longer compared to static or slow-moving ones. In this study, we explored whether this effect depends on stimulus configuration and persists when salient sensory cues at interval onset and offset are available to solve the temporal task ("filled" vs. "flanked" condition). Additionally, given the strong link between speed and time, we wonder whether stimulus duration can affect speed judgments. To answer these questions, we ran two distinct experiments in which healthy volunteers discriminated either the duration or the speed of noisy incoherent random dot kinematograms whose duration and speed were manipulated orthogonally. The results of both experiments revealed that perceived duration was biased by the stimulus speed, as expected, and that this effect persisted across stimulus configurations. Moreover, we found that the duration of the stimulus influenced the perception of speed, albeit to a lesser degree. These findings emphasize the significance of sensory input integration and the temporal structure of stimuli in shaping both duration and speed perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.