Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711490›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2026

Post-treatment infection prediction in CLL using domain adaptation of lymphoma electronic health records.

Mehdi Parviz, Christian Brieghel, Mikkel Werling, Thomas Lacoppidan, Emelie Rotbain, Carsten U Niemann, Rudi Agius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehdi ParvizDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. mehdi.parviz@bio.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-0786-5915
Christian BrieghelDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Cancer Institute, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel WerlingDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Cancer Institute, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas LacoppidanDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Cancer Institute, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emelie RotbainDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Cancer Institute, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carsten U NiemannDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Cancer Institute, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9880-5242
Rudi AgiusDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeInfections are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and occur during and after treatment. When deciding on the type of CLL treatment, the risk of infections is typically assessed based only on age and comorbidities; therefore, there is a need to develop a predictive model that incorporates information from multiple data sources. However, training an effective machine learning model requires a large sample size. Patient/material and methods: In this study, we developed a machine learning approach using domain adaptation (DA) to predict the risk of severe infection during treatment in patients with CLL. We implemented a DA strategy using lymphoma patient data and compared it with a domain-specific (DS) strategy across multiple models.

resultsThe DA strategy outperformed the DS strategy across all models, with an odds ratio of 4.43 for infection risk between high-risk and low-risk groups, compared with an odds ratio of 3.69 for the best DS model and 2.27 for the CLL-IPI alone. Explainability analysis identified predictive features for both the DA and DS models, including medication data and biochemistry tests. Specifically, C-reactive protein levels and non-therapeutic drugs were common features identified by both DA and DS models, while the DA models relied more heavily on alimentary tract drugs, solvents and diluting agents, and antibacterial medications.

interpretationThese findings highlight the value of integrating data from different diseases (lymphoma) to improve predictions in a target disease (CLL), and represent a step toward data-driven identification of CLL patients at high risk of infection during treatment.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsInfectionsLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMachine LearningAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41711490
PMCPMC12927150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.