ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2026
Post-treatment infection prediction in CLL using domain adaptation of lymphoma electronic health records.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeInfections are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and occur during and after treatment. When deciding on the type of CLL treatment, the risk of infections is typically assessed based only on age and comorbidities; therefore, there is a need to develop a predictive model that incorporates information from multiple data sources. However, training an effective machine learning model requires a large sample size. Patient/material and methods: In this study, we developed a machine learning approach using domain adaptation (DA) to predict the risk of severe infection during treatment in patients with CLL. We implemented a DA strategy using lymphoma patient data and compared it with a domain-specific (DS) strategy across multiple models.
resultsThe DA strategy outperformed the DS strategy across all models, with an odds ratio of 4.43 for infection risk between high-risk and low-risk groups, compared with an odds ratio of 3.69 for the best DS model and 2.27 for the CLL-IPI alone. Explainability analysis identified predictive features for both the DA and DS models, including medication data and biochemistry tests. Specifically, C-reactive protein levels and non-therapeutic drugs were common features identified by both DA and DS models, while the DA models relied more heavily on alimentary tract drugs, solvents and diluting agents, and antibacterial medications.
interpretationThese findings highlight the value of integrating data from different diseases (lymphoma) to improve predictions in a target disease (CLL), and represent a step toward data-driven identification of CLL patients at high risk of infection during treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.