Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711435›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026

Effect of a liquid syllabus on student engagement and sense of belonging.

Rachel H Winpisinger, Olivia M Riley, Joey Veno, Nicole Navas, Michaela A Gazdik Stofer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel H WinpisingerDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Olivia M RileyDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1542-9208
Joey VenoDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Nicole NavasDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Michaela A Gazdik StoferDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9415-7436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A syllabus provides students with important course information but can also shape students' initial perceptions about a course and instructor. The use of a web-based liquid syllabus is believed to provide a positive, welcoming introduction to a course. However, the impact of liquid syllabi is understudied. We completed a mixed methods study to examine how different syllabus formats influence students' initial perceptions of an introductory biology course and instructor, specifically focusing on engagement, sense of belonging, and instructor attributes. Undergraduate students were randomly assigned to view one of three syllabus types: a traditional PDF-style, a PDF-style with welcoming language, or a website-based liquid syllabus before completing a survey about their perceptions. The liquid syllabus significantly increased students' predicted sense of belonging, engagement, and perceived instructor inclusiveness compared to both PDF formats. Furthermore, qualitative data revealed a strong student preference for the liquid syllabus, primarily due to its visual appeal, organization, and ease of navigation. Our findings indicate that a liquid syllabus is an effective tool to foster positive initial student perceptions of belonging and engagement, traits known to be important for student success in STEM disciplines.

Indexed as

liquid syllabussense of belongingstudent engagementsyllabus format

Identifiers

PMID41711435
PMCPMC13131015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.