Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711388›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology2026

Automated Risk Assessment of Opioid Use: Analysis Using Pre-Trained Transformers on Social Media Data.

Muhammad Ahmad, Rita Orji, Maaz Amjad, Abubakar Siddique, Nailya Kubysheva, Ildar Batyrshin, Grigori Sidorov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad AhmadInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación en Computación, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0003-8799-8212
Rita OrjiFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6152-8034
Maaz AmjadDepartment of Computer Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5969-9085
Abubakar SiddiqueSchool of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3253-802X
Nailya KubyshevaKazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-5582-5814
Ildar BatyrshinInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación en Computación, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0241-7902
Grigori SidorovInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación en Computación, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3901-3522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe illegal use of opioids has emerged as a major global public health concern, contributing to widespread addiction and a growing number of overdose-related deaths. In response, the US federal government has invested billions of dollars in combating the opioid epidemic through treatment, prevention, and law enforcement initiatives. Despite these efforts, there remains an urgent need for automated tools capable of detecting overdose cases and assessing the risk levels of substances-tools that can enable faster, more effective responses with less reliance on human intervention. Social media, particularly Reddit, has become a valuable source of self-reported data on opioid misuse, offering rich insights into user experiences and symptoms.

objectiveThis research aimed to develop an advanced automated tool for detecting opioid overdose risks and classifying substances into high-risk and low-risk categories by analyzing social media posts.

methodsA multistage methodology was used to achieve the objectives of this work. First, a new dataset was constructed from Reddit posts and manually annotated. Each post was labeled according to the risk level of the mentioned substance, using contextual indicators and user-reported experiences as the basis for classification. To ensure reliability and annotator consistency, detailed annotation guidelines were developed and applied throughout the labeling process. Second, a bidirectional encoder representation from transformers for biomedical text mining (BioBERT)-based classification framework was implemented and enhanced with a custom attention mechanism to capture relevant semantic information for more accurate predictions. Third, the model's performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and compared against several baseline approaches, including traditional supervised learning, deep learning, and transfer learning methods. In total, 14 experiments were conducted to evaluate comparative effectiveness. To further assess the contribution of the attention layer, the best-performing model was also evaluated against a version incorporating the standard self-attention mechanism, using a train-test split. Finally, a paired t test was conducted to statistically assess the performance difference between the BioBERT-based model and the strongest baseline, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), providing validation of the observed improvements.

resultsThe proposed BioBERT model with custom attention achieved an F

conclusionsThis paper demonstrates the potential of leveraging social media data and advanced natural language processing models to build reliable systems for opioid overdose risk detection. The BioBERT model with custom attention shows state-of-the-art performance and robustness, offering a powerful tool to support timely intervention and harm reduction strategies in the ongoing opioid crisis.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersSocial MediaData AnalyticsData MiningHumansRisk AssessmentAIartificial intelligenceBERTchronic paindata miningdeep learningdrug abuseopioid overdoseRedditsocial mediatransformer

Identifiers

PMID41711388
PMCPMC13147923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.