Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711361›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Cross-Modal Transfer as a Window Into the Investigation of Recent Stimulus and Response History in Perceptual Decision-Making.

Daniel C Fitze, Daniel Schlunegger, Fred W Mast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel C FitzeDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0158-7459
Daniel SchluneggerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5068-754X
Fred W MastDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0665-4457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual decisions are shaped by recent stimulus and response history, yet these history effects vary with experimental design and task structure. Their origins, the processing stages involved, the factors that determine their magnitude and the sources of individual differences require further investigation. We propose a multisensory approach that leverages cross-modal transfer of history effects as a diagnostic tool to address these open questions. Visual-vestibular stimuli are particularly suitable because both modalities contribute to estimating the body's position in space and they likely share central processing stages. This approach allows for manipulation of response format, independently of sensory stimulation. By moving beyond isolated sensory channels and examine perceptual decisions as they occur in everyday multisensory environments, we provide a framework to investigate when, how and why recent history shapes perception.

Indexed as

Decision MakingVisual PerceptionAnimalsHumanschoice historyheading taskperceptual decision‐makingresponse biassequential choice effectsserial dependence

Identifiers

PMID41711361
PMCPMC12918500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.