ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2026
The responsive nucleus: morphological signatures of cellular state.
Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear morphology is increasingly recognized as an integrative indicator of cellular state across diverse physiological and pathological conditions. Beyond storing genetic material, the nucleus also acts as a dynamic sensor responding to mechanical, biochemical, and epigenetic cues. These stimuli reshape nuclear size, architecture, chromatin organization, and envelope integrity providing valuable information about cell cycle progression, differentiation, senescence, and stress responses. Such features offer a scalable and non-invasive approach to assess cell fate. In this review, we position the nuclear envelope as a key sensor of nuclear morphology, outline major triggers of nuclear deformation, discuss the molecular and biophysical processes preserving nuclear integrity and highlight the diversity of nuclear phenotypes with diagnostic and prognostic value. This review provides a comprehensive and critical synthesis of the current knowledge on the regulation and functional relevance of nuclear morphology to serve as a resource and reference point for future interdisciplinary studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.