Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711251›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2026

Vasopressin in cardiogenic shock: pathophysiology, clinical evidence, and therapeutic perspectives.

Simone Filomia, Marco Giuseppe Del Buono, Gianluigi Saponara, Alessia d'Aiello, Daniela Pedicino, Francesco Moroni, Antonio Abbate, Tommaso Sanna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simone FilomiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli, Rome 1-00168, Italy.
Marco Giuseppe Del BuonoDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli, Rome 1-00168, Italy.
Gianluigi SaponaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli, Rome 1-00168, Italy.
Alessia d'AielloDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli, Rome 1-00168, Italy.
Daniela PedicinoDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli, Rome 1-00168, Italy.
Francesco MoroniBerne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Antonio AbbateBerne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Tommaso SannaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli, Rome 1-00168, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5760-6885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vasopressin is a non-adrenergic vasopressor, commonly used in distributive shock, that may offer therapeutic benefits in selected phenotypes of cardiogenic shock. This review presents a comprehensive synthesis of its pharmacologic mechanisms, haemodynamic effects, clinical applications, and potential adverse outcomes in this complex setting. We delineate clinical scenarios in which vasopressin may be advantageous, critically appraise the current evidence, and support a physiology-guided, individualized approach to treatment. Patient profiles that may particularly benefit include advanced or mixed cardiogenic shock with low systemic vascular resistance, tachyarrhythmia-related shock, post-cardiac arrest shock, acute right ventricular failure, mitral stenosis, prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis, dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, Takotsubo syndrome, and severe aortic stenosis. In these settings, vasopressin's non-adrenergic mechanism of action may improve perfusion pressure while mitigating catecholamine-related adverse effects. We also outline clinical scenarios of cardiogenic shock in which vasopressin use may be detrimental and discuss its implications in patients receiving mechanical circulatory support. Finally, we highlight the need for prospective studies to optimize vasopressor selection in this high-risk and heterogeneous population.

Indexed as

Cardiogenic shockHaemodynamic supportMixed shockTachyarrhythmiasVasopressinVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID41711251
PMCPMC13135084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.