ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Challenges and Solutions for Collaboration Among a Nonprofit Organization, Primary Care, Private Healthcare, and the Community Sector: An Instrumental Case Study.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with complex needs often have unmet biopsychosocial needs that require integrated services through intersectoral collaboration. Few studies have evaluated the factors influencing intersectoral collaboration for health improvement of a vulnerable population between non-profit organizations (NPOs) and primary health care partners in rural areas. The objectives of the study are: (1) to describe intersectoral collaboration between an NPO and its social and primary health care partners in a rural setting; and (2) to identify the elements that facilitate or hinder this collaboration.
methodsAn instrumental case study was conducted through field research. Data collection included non-participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and analysis of documents. A thematic analysis was then carried out, and a case story was written.
resultsThe case study provides an in-depth account of the case, its context, and the key factors influencing intersectoral collaboration. Fourteen factors were identified as having a significant impact on intersectoral collaboration with the NPO. These factors had positive and negative effects on collaboration efforts. Several of these effects are also factors that had, in turn, effects on collaboration.
conclusionImplementing intersectoral collaborations requires a shared vision, healthy relationships, and transparent, respectful communication, among other important factors. Our study provides leaders of healthcare projects in rural areas with actionable advice to address potential challenges and enhance the effectiveness of their collaborative efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.