SynthesisTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
The effectiveness of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation combined with rehabilitation training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a cornerstone of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management, but exercise intolerance often limits its effectiveness. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) during PR may enhance training tolerance and outcomes, yet the overall evidence remains uncertain.
objectivesTo evaluate the effects of adding NPPV to PR on exercise capacity, dyspnea, and respiratory muscle strength in patients with COPD.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES AND
methodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from inception to December 2024 for RCTs evaluating NPPV combined with PR in patients with COPD. Two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2), extracted data, and performed analyses using RevMan 5.3.
resultsA total of 17 RCTs (489 participants; predominantly GOLD stage III-IV) were included. NPPV + PR significantly improved 6-minute walk distance (MD = 29.1 m, 95% CI: 3.6-54.6), incremental shuttle walk test distance (MD = 21.8 m, 95% CI: 5.0-38.7), peak oxygen uptake (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.23-0.83), maximal inspiratory pressure (Pimax; MD = 5.8 cmH
conclusionAdding NPPV to exercise-based PR provides clinically meaningful improvements in exercise capacity, dyspnea, and respiratory muscle strength in patients with COPD who have significant exercise limitation. NPPV may be a valuable adjunct to optimize PR outcomes in this population.
trial registrationThis review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023486598).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.