ArticleNursing in critical care2026
Exploring Practices During Nursing Handovers in Critical Care: An Anthropological Study.
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNursing handovers in intensive care units (ICUs) are critical for ensuring continuity of care, patient safety and clinical decision-making. Beyond information transfer, handovers are key moments in which nursing expertise can influence treatment trajectories. However, power relations, communication practices and the visibility of nursing knowledge during handovers remain underexplored, particularly through the lens of critical medical anthropology and the concept of heterotopia.
aimTo explore how experienced ICU nurses participate in and influence clinical decision-making through handover practices. STUDY
designThis ethnographic study, grounded in a critical medical anthropology approach, was conducted in a general ICU in Greece. Data collection involved overt participant observation and ad hoc ethnographic interviews with ICU nurses and physicians, as part of a larger PhD study. Nurses who participated in interviews subsequently consented to observation while working. Fieldwork spanned 2 years (2012-2014) and concluded in 2020. Multiple nursing handovers were observed, and thematic analysis was applied to fieldnotes using Atlas.ti.
findingsNursing handovers functioned as heterotopias of nursing expertise, offering moments of access to clinical decision-making. Four sub-themes emerged: (a) narrating the patient's illness trajectory; (b) showcasing expertise and mentoring less experienced colleagues; (c) verbalising and consolidating clinical decisions; and (d) temporarily reversing hierarchical power dynamics. Through these practices, experienced nurses rendered their clinical reasoning visible and exerted influence over patient management.
conclusionsNursing handovers represent strategic opportunities for nurses to navigate and renegotiate professional boundaries within the ICU. The findings highlight the potential of handovers to strengthen team collaboration, support clinical decision-making and enhance patient care. Recognising handovers as protected spaces for nursing expertise is essential for promoting professional autonomy within critical care settings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Protecting nursing handovers as spaces of professional dialogue can enhance communication, clinical reasoning and patient safety. Combining structured and narrative-based handover training may empower nurses, preserve mentoring and role-modelling functions and sustain professional visibility-particularly relevant in the post-COVID-19 era, where digital and hybrid communication models increasingly shape critical care practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.