ArticleFamily process2026
Three Forms of Korean American Indirect Parental Warmth: Associations With Maternal Predictors and Adolescent Outcomes.
Article in Family process, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Korean American parents express warmth indirectly (e.g., through devoted attention), which can be contrasted with explicit expressions of warmth (e.g., stating love, hugging). This study investigated three distinct forms of indirect warmth. Thoughtfulness involves parents anticipating and meeting children's needs before they are expressed. Devotion to education concerns prioritizing a supportive learning environment over parental interests. Guan behavior involves communicating clear standards to children, in a manner sensitive to their abilities. The present longitudinal study examined, in a path analysis, whether Time 1 (T1) Korean American adolescents' perceptions of the three separate forms of indirect warmth were positively predicted by T1 maternal reports of supportiveness and demandingness or guan ideology. Guan ideology predicted devotion, β = 0.08, p = 0.048, as well as guan behavior, β = 0.11, p = 0.008. Supportiveness predicted thoughtfulness, β = 0.11, p = 0.005. The study also examined whether the T1 variables predicted T2 adolescent outcomes. T1 thoughtfulness predicted T2 prosocial behavior, β = 0.15, p = 0.007, and relationship quality, β = 0.05, p = 0.001. T2 GPA was predicted by T1 supportiveness, β = 0.12, p = 0.048, and devotion, β = 0.18, p = 0.014. There was evidence for full mediation from supportiveness via thoughtfulness for relationship quality, β = 0.02, p = 0.029, and prosocial behavior β = 0.02, p = 0.052. Because supportiveness had its influence on the latter two variables via thoughtfulness, those who work with Korean American families may want to consider addressing thoughtfulness directly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.