Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710914›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026

The clinical utility of nasal MRSA PCR as an antimicrobial stewardship tool to guide MRSA bacteraemia therapy in paediatrics: a retrospective study at a tertiary care centre.

Fahad Alrashed, Ebrahim Alsaadoon, Aeshah Alosaimi, Sameer Desai, Reem Almutairi, Bander Alrshaid, Sami Alhajjar, Ohoud Alyabes, Esam Albanyan, Mohammed Alsuhaibani and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fahad AlrashedPaediatric Infectious Diseases Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ebrahim AlsaadoonPaediatric Infectious Diseases Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aeshah AlosaimiInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sameer DesaiBiostatistics Epidemiology & Scientific Computing Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Reem AlmutairiBiostatistics Epidemiology & Scientific Computing Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bander AlrshaidPathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sami AlhajjarPaediatric Infectious Diseases Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ohoud AlyabesPaediatric Infectious Diseases Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Esam AlbanyanPaediatric Infectious Diseases Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlsuhaibaniPaediatric Infectious Diseases Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Suliman AljumaahPaediatric Infectious Diseases Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim Bin HussainPaediatric Infectious Diseases Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Salem M AlghamdiPaediatric Infectious Diseases Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Vancomycin is the main therapeutic choice for paediatric methicillin-resistant Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare centre from January 2021 to January 2024. It included paediatric patients who were screened for MRSA nasal colonization via PCR and had a blood culture obtained within 7 days of the MRSA PCR collection date. Clinical characteristics were compared between the positive and negative PCR groups. Positive and negative predictive values were determined. The association between mortality and anti-MRSA therapy was explored for patients with no confirmed MRSA infection. Results: A total of 1136 PCR tests were analysed with 161 positive results. The positive PCR group had a higher proportion of patients with intensive care unit admission, inotropic support and absolute neutrophil count >500. The positive PCR group had a higher proportion of patients who received anti-MRSA therapy, although no significant difference was observed in the therapy duration between the groups. The nasal MRSA PCR showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 5.6% and a negative predictive value of 99.8%. When the analysis was restricted to patients with paediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome, the PPV increased to 9%. Among patients who had negative PCR and culture results, a higher risk of mortality was observed for those using anti-MRSA therapy. Conclusion: Nasal MRSA PCR may serve as a valuable component of antimicrobial stewardship programmes to optimize the prescribing practices of anti-MRSA therapy.

Identifiers

PMID41710914
PMCPMC12910373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.