ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
The clinical utility of nasal MRSA PCR as an antimicrobial stewardship tool to guide MRSA bacteraemia therapy in paediatrics: a retrospective study at a tertiary care centre.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Vancomycin is the main therapeutic choice for paediatric methicillin-resistant Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare centre from January 2021 to January 2024. It included paediatric patients who were screened for MRSA nasal colonization via PCR and had a blood culture obtained within 7 days of the MRSA PCR collection date. Clinical characteristics were compared between the positive and negative PCR groups. Positive and negative predictive values were determined. The association between mortality and anti-MRSA therapy was explored for patients with no confirmed MRSA infection. Results: A total of 1136 PCR tests were analysed with 161 positive results. The positive PCR group had a higher proportion of patients with intensive care unit admission, inotropic support and absolute neutrophil count >500. The positive PCR group had a higher proportion of patients who received anti-MRSA therapy, although no significant difference was observed in the therapy duration between the groups. The nasal MRSA PCR showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 5.6% and a negative predictive value of 99.8%. When the analysis was restricted to patients with paediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome, the PPV increased to 9%. Among patients who had negative PCR and culture results, a higher risk of mortality was observed for those using anti-MRSA therapy. Conclusion: Nasal MRSA PCR may serve as a valuable component of antimicrobial stewardship programmes to optimize the prescribing practices of anti-MRSA therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.