ReviewCureus2026
Iatrogenic Nerve Injuries in Head and Neck Surgeries: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms, Outcomes, and Prevention Strategies.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iatrogenic nerve injury in head and neck surgery remains a substantial yet potentially preventable source of morbidity across endocrine, otolaryngologic, and related procedures. This systematic review synthesized evidence to identify the nerves most frequently affected, delineate operative mechanisms of injury, describe the clinical course, and evaluate preventive strategies. Traction on visually intact nerves emerged as the predominant mechanism, with additional contributions from thermal injury, compression, ischemia, and entrapment by suture or clip. The recurrent laryngeal, facial, trigeminal (inferior alveolar and lingual), spinal accessory, and lower cranial nerves were identified as the principal structures at risk, with procedure type influencing the pattern and severity of deficits. Prevention centered on deliberate visual identification, meticulous dissection along natural planes, and risk-stratified use of intraoperative nerve monitoring, which proved most beneficial in complex or reparative fields. While most postoperative deficits resolved over time, a subset persisted, impairing voice, swallowing, facial movement, shoulder function, or orofacial sensation. Early, tension-free microsurgical repair was associated with superior recovery compared to delayed intervention. Despite heterogeneity in definitions, assessment timing, and follow-up, these findings support a practical prevention framework that integrates precise anatomical techniques, gentle handling, structured monitoring in high-risk cases, and timely referral for persistent deficits to minimize avoidable nerve injury and improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.