Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710828›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Preoperative Central Sensitization as a Predictor of Pain Outcomes After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Majed S Alasbali, Yaser A Alshammari, Mohammed S Alhomaidi, Ibrahim A Alaqil, Murad A Sharif, Abdulelah M Al-Shahir, Abdullah J Al Ghamdi, Abdulkarim O Althobaiti, Hetaf M Alotaibi, Ahmed M Elsayed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Majed S AlasbaliDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Yaser A AlshammariCollege of Medicine, Hail University, Hail, SAU.
Mohammed S AlhomaidiCollege of Medicine, Hail University, Hail, SAU.
Ibrahim A AlaqilCollege of Medicine, Hail University, Hail, SAU.
Murad A SharifCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Abdulelah M Al-ShahirCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.
Abdullah J Al GhamdiCollege of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EGY.
Abdulkarim O AlthobaitiFaculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, SAU.
Hetaf M AlotaibiFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Ahmed M ElsayedDepartment of Pediatric Rehabilitation, Physiobasic Rehabilitation Center, Jazan, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent pain remains a common clinical challenge after hip and knee arthroplasty, even when surgical outcomes are technically successful, with growing recognition that altered central pain processing, particularly central sensitization (CS), may contribute to unfavorable postoperative outcomes. This systematic review evaluated whether preoperative CS predicts poor pain-related outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to the final search date, identifying observational studies that assessed CS using validated instruments such as the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and quantitative sensory testing (QST) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, revision knee arthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Extracted outcomes included postoperative pain intensity, functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, analgesic consumption, development of chronic postsurgical pain, and achievement of minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs), while methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Nine observational studies met the inclusion criteria, and across these studies, preoperative CS was consistently associated with higher postoperative pain intensity, an increased risk of chronic postsurgical pain, a lower likelihood of achieving clinically meaningful pain improvement, greater use of analgesics, and reduced patient satisfaction. In contrast, patients without evidence of CS experienced superior pain relief and functional recovery across all follow-up periods, including short-, mid-, and long-term. Overall, study quality ranged from moderate to high. These findings indicate that preoperative CS is a strong predictor of poor pain-related outcomes following hip and knee arthroplasty, and incorporating CS assessment into preoperative evaluation may support improved risk stratification and the development of personalized perioperative pain management strategies to optimize postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

central sensitizationcentral sensitization inventorychronic postsurgical painhip arthroplastyknee arthroplastypain predictionpostoperative painquantitative sensory testing

Identifiers

PMID41710828
PMCPMC12910524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.