Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710826›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Déjà Vu in the Operating Room: Recurrent Extraction of an Anal Sexual Foreign Body.

Isabel Sierra Fernandez, Luis Hurtado Pardo, Carla Leal Ferrandis

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabel Sierra FernandezGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, ESP.
Luis Hurtado PardoGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, ESP.
Carla Leal FerrandisGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, ESP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal foreign body insertion is an uncommon presentation that may lead to serious complications if not promptly recognised and properly managed. While many cases are related to sexual experimentation, repeated insertions can reflect underlying behavioural or psychiatric conditions. The behaviour, known as polyembolokoilamania, remains insufficiently described in current medical literature, particularly when it involves recurrent episodes in the same individual. We report a 39-year-old male patient with no significant comorbidities who presented on four separate occasions over a two-year period following the insertion of rectal foreign bodies for sexual stimulation. The objects progressively increased in size, from a 5 cm spherical item to a 10 cm soft plastic ball. All were successfully removed manually under sedation, without perforation, bleeding, or other complications. Radiographic imaging was used in each episode to confirm the position and dimensions of the objects prior to extraction. This case illustrates the diagnostic and technical challenges associated with recurrent rectal foreign body insertion, as well as the need to address underlying psychosocial and psychiatric factors that contribute to recurrence. Successful management relies not only on careful surgical extraction but also on comprehensive evaluation and follow-up. A coordinated, multidisciplinary approach-combining surgical expertise with psychological and psychiatric support-is essential to prevent further episodes and to improve long-term outcomes in patients presenting with polyembolokoilamania.

Indexed as

anal emergency surgeryanal foreign body extractionanal injuriesforeign body insertionrisky sexual behaviours

Identifiers

PMID41710826
PMCPMC12912819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.