ArticleCureus2026
Déjà Vu in the Operating Room: Recurrent Extraction of an Anal Sexual Foreign Body.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal foreign body insertion is an uncommon presentation that may lead to serious complications if not promptly recognised and properly managed. While many cases are related to sexual experimentation, repeated insertions can reflect underlying behavioural or psychiatric conditions. The behaviour, known as polyembolokoilamania, remains insufficiently described in current medical literature, particularly when it involves recurrent episodes in the same individual. We report a 39-year-old male patient with no significant comorbidities who presented on four separate occasions over a two-year period following the insertion of rectal foreign bodies for sexual stimulation. The objects progressively increased in size, from a 5 cm spherical item to a 10 cm soft plastic ball. All were successfully removed manually under sedation, without perforation, bleeding, or other complications. Radiographic imaging was used in each episode to confirm the position and dimensions of the objects prior to extraction. This case illustrates the diagnostic and technical challenges associated with recurrent rectal foreign body insertion, as well as the need to address underlying psychosocial and psychiatric factors that contribute to recurrence. Successful management relies not only on careful surgical extraction but also on comprehensive evaluation and follow-up. A coordinated, multidisciplinary approach-combining surgical expertise with psychological and psychiatric support-is essential to prevent further episodes and to improve long-term outcomes in patients presenting with polyembolokoilamania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.