ArticleCureus2026
Comparing Virtual Reality and Audio Analgesia for Reducing Dental Anxiety During Mandibular Third Molar Surgery in Adults: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Dental anxiety frequently hinders treatment compliance, particularly during mandibular third molar surgery. Nonpharmacological distractions, such as virtual reality (VR) and audio analgesia, offer promising alternatives for managing anxiety and pain. This study compared the effectiveness of patient self-selected VR and audio analgesia versus no intervention in reducing anxiety and pain, physiological stress markers, and enhancing satisfaction during mandibular third molar surgery in adults. Methods In this prospective observational study, 150 patients aged 17-45 years undergoing impacted mandibular third molar extraction were self-selected into three groups (n = 50 each): VR (immersive calming environments via headset), audio analgesia (relaxing music via noise-canceling earbuds), and control (no distraction). The outcomes assessed included anxiety (Visual Facial Anxiety Scale), pain (Visual Analog Scale), heart rate and blood pressure, and satisfaction (5-point Likert scale) in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages. The data were then statistically analyzed. Results The groups showed comparable baseline characteristics and preoperative anxiety (p > 0.05). Postoperatively, VR was associated with the lowest pain scores (median 2) and highest satisfaction (median 5), followed by audio analgesia (pain median 3-4; satisfaction 4) and control (pain median 5; satisfaction 3) (p < 0.001). VR correlated with higher heart rate and blood pressure, indicating possible arousal, and showed significant time-by-group interactions (p < 0.01). Conclusions Patient-preferred VR significantly reduced postoperative pain and increased satisfaction compared with audio analgesia or no intervention during mandibular third molar surgery. Despite higher heart rate and blood pressure in the VR group, subjective comfort was markedly improved. Audio analgesia provided moderate benefits as a simpler alternative. These findings support the use of VR as an effective, nonpharmacological tool to improve patient experience in adult oral surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.