ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025
Nasal eosinophilia and its clinical correlates in patients with allergic rhinitis at a Kenyan tertiary hospital.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The SP-MrgprX2 Axis in Allergic Rhinitis: a Neuro-immune Paradigm Beyond IgE-mediated Inflammation.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Assessment of Inflammation Control in Allergic Rhinitis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is an IgE- mediated inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa. While the diagnosis mainly relies on a typical clinical history and physical examination, the evaluation of eosinophils in nasal smears is considered a direct marker of inflammation and can play a role in the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment response. The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of nasal eosinophils among patients with AR, and to correlate these levels with disease severity and frequency. Material and methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Kenya from November 2022 to January 2023. Patients were diagnosed with AR using the Score for Allergic Rhinitis (SFAR) questionnaire. A Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) questionnaire was administered to evaluate for nasal symptoms and assign severity scores. The patients were categorized according to the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines into either intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis groups, and further sub-classified into mild, or moderate-to-severe AR. Nasal smears were collected to quantify eosinophil counts. Results: The study included 73 patients comprising 35 (47.9%) males and 38 (52.1%) females. The median age of the participants was 19 years (Interquartile Range 9-38), with an age range of 5-84 years. Most patients presented with intermittent symptoms (58.9%) and moderate-to-severe disease (61.6%). Pathological levels of eosinophils were found in 15 patients (20.5%). However, there was no statistically significant correlation between the level of nasal eosinophilia and either disease severity ( Conclusion: In this study, nasal eosinophils counts did not correlate with the severity or frequency of AR as defined by the ARIA classification. These findings suggest that while the presence of nasal eosinophilia is useful for confirming the underlying type 2 inflammation in AR, it should not be used as a standalone biomarker to determine disease severity or guide management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.