Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710807›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Ocular VEMP Using Bone Conduction Stimuli at the Forehead - A Pilot Study Comparing B250, Minishaker and Tendon Hammer with Vibrometry Validation.

Bo E V Håkansson, Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson, Luca Verrecchia, Zheer Tawfique, Laura Froehlich, Julia Dlugaiczyk, Torsten Rahne, Måns Eeg-Olofsson, Emil Håkansson, Sabine Reinfeldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bo E V HåkanssonDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3516-5924
Karl-Johan Fredén JanssonDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3045-253X
Luca VerrecchiaDepartment of Audiology and Neurotology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Zheer TawfiqueDepartment of Audiology and Neurotology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Laura FroehlichDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Julia DlugaiczykDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Interdisciplinary Center for Vertigo, Balance and Ocular Motor Disorders, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
Torsten RahneDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medicine Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Måns Eeg-OlofssonDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Emil HåkanssonDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sabine ReinfeldtDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2329-8706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bone-conduction stimuli in oVEMP testing offer lower stimulus levels and independence of conductive hearing loss but lack a clinically suitable transducer for excitation. A new bone-conduction transducer (B250) has been developed which is easy to attach and can be directly connected to test stations. Objective: To compare, in a pilot investigation B250, Minishaker and Tendon hammer excitation, used for oVEMP and mastoid vibration measurements. Methods: oVEMPs in three subjects were measured using transducers driven by a 250 Hz condensation single sinus cycle and with a Tendon hammer, all applied at forehead Fz/AFz. Corresponding mastoid velocity was measured using a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV). Results: B250 and Minishaker often produced dual oVEMP peaks with an early n1 (mean latency: 8.8 ms) and a late n2 response (B250: 12.4/Minishaker: 13.3 ms), and with the Tendon hammer response in between. This finding was supported by a reinvestigation of a previous study (n=15). LDV velocity shows several positive peaks for B250 and one positive peak for the Minishaker. The acceleration response has two peaks 4 ms apart for both transducers, which seem to relate to the early and late oVEMP latencies. Conclusion: B250 may serve as a potential alternative, pending validation in larger samples, to the Minishaker at the forehead, but with care to polarity choice and latency interpretation.

Indexed as

bone conduction transducerforehead stimuluslaser Doppler vibrometryoVEMP

Identifiers

PMID41710807
PMCPMC12912185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.