Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710777›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biomaterials2026

Selecting Hydrogel Films Composed of Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Microcrystalline Cellulose From OPEFB With Citric Acid as a Green Crosslinker for Fruit Wrapping.

Susi Susi, Makhmudun Ainuri, Wagiman Wagiman, Mohammad Affan Fajar Falah, Hisyam Musthafa Al Hakim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susi SusiDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Lambung Mangkurat University, Jl A Yani Km 36, Banjarbaru, 70714, South Kalimantan, Indonesia, unlam.ac.id.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0248-5473
Makhmudun AinuriDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Jl Flora No 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia, ugm.ac.id.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1788-0062
Wagiman WagimanDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Jl Flora No 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia, ugm.ac.id.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-9970
Mohammad Affan Fajar FalahDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Jl Flora No 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia, ugm.ac.id.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1276-218X
Hisyam Musthafa Al HakimDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Lambung Mangkurat University, Jl A Yani Km 36, Banjarbaru, 70714, South Kalimantan, Indonesia, unlam.ac.id.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1470-5526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose-based hydrogel films are promising alternatives to plastic for wrapping. Hydrogel films based on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) must exhibit high mechanical strength and be capable of absorbing moisture. Crosslinking increases the absorption capacity and mechanical strength of hydrogel films. As a filler, MCC can synergize with citric acid, which acts as an environmentally friendly crosslinker to enhance mechanical strength. This research aimed to develop a suitable CMC/MCC formulation and citric acid as a crosslinker, resulting in a hydrogel with high water absorption and mechanical strength. CMC/MCC formulations were combined with citric acid concentrations of 5%, 7.5%, and 10%. The results showed that the MCC and citric acid will affect absorption and mechanical strength. The addition of MCC up to 50% tends to produce a brittle hydrogel film, and this phenomenon is also correlated with increased citric acid. A 90:10 CMC/MCC formulation with 5% citric acid (w/v) resulted in a water uptake of 222.72 ± 9.32 at pH 7.0. In contrast, the 80:20 CMC/MCC formulation resulted in a water uptake of 603.02 ± 26.98. They both showed higher rehydration of the dry gel than the others. FTIR confirmed the sharpening of the peak wave number at 1705 cm

Identifiers

PMID41710777
PMCPMC12911528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.