ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Decision-making in return to sport clearance after ACL reconstruction is primarily based on objective criteria: Insights from AGA knee experts.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- No clear association between time to return-to-play and first additional injury in European professional football players after ACL injury: A media-based study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Lateral extra-articular procedures in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduce graft failure rates in elite and competitive athletes: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Decision-making in return to sport clearance after ACL reconstruction is primarily based on objective criteria: Insights from AGA knee experts.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify current surgical strategies and objective criteria used for return to sport (RTS) clearance after primary isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, based on a survey of knee surgery experts. Methods: An online survey was developed by the 'Knee Ligament' committee of the German-speaking Arthroscopy Society (AGA) and distributed to certified 'AGA Knee Experts' in November and December 2023. The final questionnaire consisted of 26 questions covering surgical strategies, postoperative evaluation, and RTS clearance after primary isolated ACL reconstruction. Participants were asked to rank objective RTS criteria, and weighted mean ranks were calculated to assess their relative importance (1 = most important, 8 = least important). Data were analysed descriptively to reflect current expert practices. Results: A total of 113 board-certified knee surgeons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland participated in this survey. Hamstring tendon autografts were the preferred graft choice for primary isolated ACL reconstruction (87%), with over half of the respondents (58%) adapting graft selection based on the patient's activity level. RTS testing is routinely performed by 64% of participants. The most frequently used RTS tests are hop tests (93%), assessment of movement quality (59%), and postural stability (56%). The most important objective criteria for RTS clearance were time since ACL reconstruction (mean rank, 2.7), manual clinical examination (mean rank, 2.7), and RTS assessment tools (mean rank, 3.2). Concomitant surgical procedures such as cartilage treatment, meniscus repair, and osteotomies affect RTS clearance. Sport psychological assessment is rarely used (12%). Conclusion: This study found that knee experts prioritised time since surgery, clinical examination, and RTS assessment tools as the most important criteria for unrestricted RTS clearance after primary isolated ACL reconstruction. RTS clearance is affected by concomitant surgical procedures, whereas psychological assessment remains uncommon. Level of Evidence: Level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.