ArticleDigital health
Theory-guided eHealth literacy support for tele-pulmonary rehabilitation in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Improving eHealth Literacy Among Patients With Chronic Diseases: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop and evaluate theory-guided eHealth literacy support for tele-pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: Sixty-five COPD patients in the intervention group received an eHealth literacy intervention guided by self-regulated learning model and self-efficacy theory (SRL-SEe PR group), while 65 control patients received an eHealth literacy intervention guided by the self-efficacy theory (SEe PR group). Both groups ( Results: There were statistically significant differences in the eHealth literacy level (MD = 4.03; Conclusion: The SRL-SEe PR intervention is feasible and effective. This suggests that eHealth literacy interventions should not only focus on building individuals' learning confidence but also on teaching learning methods and health knowledge that patients are concerned about. These strategies can enhance self-efficacy, leading to better learning outcomes and higher eHealth literacy levels. Future tele-chronic disease management programs should start with disease-specific knowledge and skills, and carry out eHealth literacy training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.