ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Theory of mind on demand: do we prepare or react?
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reasoning about others' thoughts, emotions, or intentions is a sophisticated human ability. Modelling such a complex phenomenon with limited available resources is a challenging pursuit. This work proposes the hypothesis of demand-driven and reactive ToM in humans as an additional strategy to establish sufficient mental inferences in complex social spaces. The authors consider a perspective of bounded rationality and cognitive costs in conceptualising ToM and understanding how humans form, maintain, and reason with models of others efficiently and effectively. This study presents qualitative data exploring what patterns in human ToM may allow humans to quickly and seemingly effortlessly perform the complex task of inferring other people's mental states. The results consist of several themes, which point to various heuristics that may be employed in shaping tractable ToM mechanisms. In conclusion, this qualitative approach to understanding ToM efficiency shaped the hypothesis of reactive ToM mechanisms human cognition, which needs to be tested in confirmatory quantitative studies. Study limitations, implications for modelling, and directions for future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.