ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Who adapts to whom: technology or older adults? Mechanisms of technology anxiety among older AI users.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As AI rapidly permeates diverse social domains, technology related anxiety among older adults during adaptation, particularly in the context of AIGC, has become a major barrier to digital inclusion. This study aims to systematically uncover the generative mechanism and hierarchical transmission pathway of older adults' AI technology anxiety and to derive intervention implications. Methods: A mixed methods design was adopted. First, in depth interviews were conducted with 36 older AIGC users, and 14 core categories were derived using grounded theory. Second, an integrated analysis using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Cross Impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC) was performed to identify the hierarchical structure of influencing factors and their driving and dependence relationships. Results: ISM revealed a clear hierarchical transmission pathway. Technology anxiety is directly triggered by surface factors including insufficient AI literacy, physiological functional limitations, and technological complexity. It is transmitted through intermediate factors and ultimately driven by the deep rooted factor of social ageism. MICMAC further identified cognitive decline, social ageism, and basic resource barriers as high driving and low dependence independent factors. Insufficient AI literacy and technological complexity were categorized as high dependence surface factors whose improvement relies on systemic interventions. Discussion and conclusion: The findings demonstrate a multi level mechanism in which deep structural forces shape surface level anxiety experiences, suggesting that training or interface optimization alone may be insufficient. Coordinated interventions across policy guidance, inclusive technology design, and community support network development are proposed to help reduce the older adult digital divide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.