Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710730›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Who adapts to whom: technology or older adults? Mechanisms of technology anxiety among older AI users.

Peng Ji, Xiaoyu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peng JiSchool of Literature and Media, Shanxi College of Applied Science and Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Xiaoyu LiuFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, City University of Macau, Macao, Macao SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As AI rapidly permeates diverse social domains, technology related anxiety among older adults during adaptation, particularly in the context of AIGC, has become a major barrier to digital inclusion. This study aims to systematically uncover the generative mechanism and hierarchical transmission pathway of older adults' AI technology anxiety and to derive intervention implications. Methods: A mixed methods design was adopted. First, in depth interviews were conducted with 36 older AIGC users, and 14 core categories were derived using grounded theory. Second, an integrated analysis using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Cross Impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC) was performed to identify the hierarchical structure of influencing factors and their driving and dependence relationships. Results: ISM revealed a clear hierarchical transmission pathway. Technology anxiety is directly triggered by surface factors including insufficient AI literacy, physiological functional limitations, and technological complexity. It is transmitted through intermediate factors and ultimately driven by the deep rooted factor of social ageism. MICMAC further identified cognitive decline, social ageism, and basic resource barriers as high driving and low dependence independent factors. Insufficient AI literacy and technological complexity were categorized as high dependence surface factors whose improvement relies on systemic interventions. Discussion and conclusion: The findings demonstrate a multi level mechanism in which deep structural forces shape surface level anxiety experiences, suggesting that training or interface optimization alone may be insufficient. Coordinated interventions across policy guidance, inclusive technology design, and community support network development are proposed to help reduce the older adult digital divide.

Indexed as

age-friendly designartificial intelligencedigital inclusionolder userstechnology anxiety

Identifiers

PMID41710730
PMCPMC12909473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.