Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710729›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The effect of finding relationships, using variables, drawing diagrams and simplification strategies on the development of formulating skills.

Hasan Temel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hasan TemelDepartment of Mathematics Education, Necatibey Faculty of Education, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: formulation serves as a bridge between real-life situations and mathematics, is a critical skill in processes that are crucial for mathematics education, such as problem solving, mathematical literacy, modeling, realistic mathematics education, conceptual thinking, and STEM education, but also emerges as a skill that must be considered for cognitive processes such as cognitive load theory, metacognitive norms, and psychological self-regulation. The fact that most research conducted in the context of formulation remains at a descriptive level and that students are not proficient in this process highlights the need for intervention-based research to develop formulating skills. Methods: in this study, a pre-test-post-test control group quasi-experimental design was chosen to reveal the effect of the Relationships, Using Variables, Drawing Diagrams, and Simplification strategies on the ability to formulate. The participants were 52 tenth-grade students studying at an Anatolian High School in the Marmara Region of Türkiye. Two existing classes at the selected school were randomly assigned to the experimental group ( Results: pre-test scores showed that both groups had similar levels of formulation ability, with no significant difference between them ( Conclusion: the findings show that strategy-based instruction, utilizing relationships, using variables, drawing diagrams, and simplification strategies, significantly improved students' formulating skills. The strategy-based instruction designed within the framework of the Worked Examples approach has positive effects on students' cognitive load management, metacognitive awareness, and problem-solving performance. The research also contributes to the field of educational psychology both theoretically and practically.

Indexed as

cognitive load theorydrawing diagramsfinding relationshipsformulatingmathematics educationmetacognitionsimplificationusing variables

Identifiers

PMID41710729
PMCPMC12910482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.