Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710722›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2024

Neuroscience Education as a Tool for Improving Stress Management and Resilience.

Golnaz Tabibnia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Golnaz TabibniaUniversity of California, Irvine Department of Psychological Science, USA.

Funding

"Cue Labeling as a Tool to Regulate Craving During Abstinence from Smoking”.R21DA059798 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI TABIBNIA, GOLNAZ · 2024 to 2025
$470k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA059798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beliefs about stress and coping can play a major role in mental health and resilience. For example, holding a belief that stress or emotions are controllable can improve resilience. One emerging strategy for shifting beliefs and enhancing resilience is neuroscience education (neuro-education or NeuroEd). This paper proposes a NeuroEd model of building resilience in which learning about how the brain regulates internal states like stress and emotions can boost resilience by shifting beliefs. Support for the model comes in part from growing evidence in pain management demonstrating that neuro-education can help reduce pain and disability, with recent evidence that it can also impact beliefs. This paper concludes by introducing a framework for translating neuro-education for pain management into neuro-education for management of other internal states, including fear and anxiety, cravings in addiction, and stress broadly.

Indexed as

addictionanxietybeliefsemotion regulationNeuroEdneuroscience educationresiliencestress

Identifiers

PMID41710722
PMCPMC12912801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.