ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
A comparative study of stroke volume variation and plethysmography variability index as goal-directed fluid therapy in major abdominal oncosurgeries.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood Pressure and Pleth Variability Index as Predictors of Tourniquet-Release Hypotension in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Observational Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comment on: "A comparative study of stroke volume variation and plethysmography variability index as goal-directed fluid therapy in major abdominal oncosurgeries".Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Goal-directed fluid therapy with dynamic variables enhances tissue oxygen delivery. A prospective, randomized comparative study was designed with stroke volume variation (SVV) and plethysmography variability index (PVI) to study fluid responsiveness, fluid requirement, and postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: A total of 68 patients undergoing major abdominal oncosurgeries were randomly allotted to the SVV or PVI group. SVV was measured with the FlotracEV1000 arterial pressure-based waveform analyzer, and for values >11, a colloid bolus of 200 mL was given. PVI was measured with a MasimoRad-97 plethysmography analyzer as variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmography waveform amplitude, and for values >11, a colloid bolus of 200 mL was given. Fluid response was noted in both groups. Results: Total fluids ( Conclusion: Both SVV and PVI are valid predictors for fluid responsiveness and guides for fluid therapy: reduced postoperative complications and length of stay noted in both groups. PVI is a more sensitive dynamic variable than SVV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.