ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Arabic Translation & Validation of Strength, Ambulation, Rising from A Chair, Stair Climbing and History of Falling Scale (SARC-F).
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarcopenia, characterized by a progressive decline in muscle mass and function associated with aging, impacts around 10% of older adults worldwide and leads to heightened morbidity, increased hospitalization, and escalating healthcare costs. Early detection is crucial for timely intervention. The SARC-F questionnaire is a brief and validated screening tool utilized globally to identify individuals at risk of sarcopenia. Nevertheless, a validated Arabic version is currently unavailable. Methods: The SARC-F questionnaire was translated into Arabic employing a forward-backward translation method, followed by cultural adaptation, including the conversion of metric units. Content validity was evaluated by two domain experts using a 4-point relevance scale. Face validity was assessed through cognitive interviews conducted in a sample of 15 Arabic-speaking participants (range = 25-40). Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha in a sample of 120 adults (31.76 years (SD = 10.43, range = 20-68)). Test-retest reliability was analyzed utilizing the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) in a sample of 86 participants over an interval of 10 to 14 days. Inter-item associations were examined using Spearman's rank-order correlations. Results: Following an expert review and gender-inclusive modifications, the content validity index improved from 2.0 to 4.0. Face validity testing demonstrated high clarity and acceptability across all items. The internal consistency analysis yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.648, indicating moderate reliability. Furthermore, the test-retest reliability displayed a commendable ICC value of 0.767 (95% CI: 0.663-0.841). The strongest inter-item correlation was found between assistance in walking and stair climbing ( Conclusion: The Arabic version of the SARC-F exhibits acceptable content and face validity, moderate internal consistency, and good test-retest reliability. This tool is poised to enhance the early detection of sarcopenia in Arabic-speaking populations and support clinical decision-making for preventative strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.