Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710562›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2026

"Just Dive Right In!" Nurse Leaders' Experiences of Challenging Times in Clinical Settings: A Phenomenological Study.

Katrine Klette Skogøy, Anne Marit A Johnsen, Leena K Honkavuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katrine Klette SkogøyFaculty of Nursing and Health Science, North University, Bodø, Norway.
Anne Marit A JohnsenSurgical Clinic, Nordlandssykehuset, Bodø, Norway.
Leena K HonkavuoFaculty of Nursing and Health Science, North University, Bodø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1956-8790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To increase understanding and describe nurse leaders' experiences of challenging times in nurse leadership in clinical nursing context. Design and Methods: A qualitative, explorative-descriptive phenomenological approach design with inductive elements. The data material consists of semi-structured in-depth interviews with six experienced Norwegian nurse leaders from a somatic healthcare context. The interview texts phenomenological reading act and interpretation are inspired by Husserl's philosophy and Colaizzi's data analysis. Findings: A phenomenological interpretation of the nurse leaders' narratives resulted in the following thematic units: uncertainty and information overflow, self-confidence and the will to act and prioritization and collaboration. Conclusion: Prolonged challenging times in nurse leadership in clinical settings such as crises related to public health (COVID-19), staffing shortages, budget cuts, organizational restructuring, implementations of major changes or regulatory scrutiny are sometimes unexpected. They require special efforts, strategic planning and resilience from nurse leaders since they are complicated to predict, they affect changes, routines, norms and functionality of systems. The confusion caused by the challenging times is reflected in the activities of nurse leaders, healthcare organizations and society. Nurse leaders need clear communication, instructions, actions and understanding from the administration to maintain the ambidexterity of the healthcare organization and individual support in challenging times.

Indexed as

challenging timesclinical settingsexperiencesnurse leadersphenomenologyresilience

Identifiers

PMID41710562
PMCPMC12911960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.