Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710550›Full record

ArticleFindings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing2024

README: Bridging Medical Jargon and Lay Understanding for Patient Education through Data-Centric NLP.

Zonghai Yao, Nandyala Siddharth Kantu, Guanghao Wei, Hieu Tran, Zhangqi Duan, Sunjae Kwon, Zhichao Yang, README annotation team, Hong Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Findings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chatbot To Help Patients Understand Their Health.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  3. MedCOD: Enhancing English-to-Spanish Medical Translation of Large Language Models Using Enriched Chain-of-Dictionary Framework.Findings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. RARE: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Enhancement for Large Language Models.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · 2025
    Article
  6. MCQG-SRefine: Multiple Choice Question Generation and Evaluation with Iterative Self-Critique, Correction, and Comparison Feedback.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zonghai YaoUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Nandyala Siddharth KantuUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Guanghao WeiUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Hieu TranUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Zhangqi DuanUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Sunjae KwonUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Zhichao YangUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst.
README annotation team
Hong YuUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX003969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement in healthcare has shifted focus toward patient-centric approaches, particularly in self-care and patient education, facilitated by access to Electronic Health Records (EHR). However, medical jargon in EHRs poses significant challenges in patient comprehension. To address this, we introduce a new task of automatically generating lay definitions, aiming to simplify complex medical terms into patient-friendly lay language. We first created the README dataset, an extensive collection of over 50,000 unique (medical term, lay definition) pairs and 300,000 mentions, each offering context-aware lay definitions manually annotated by domain experts. We have also engineered a data-centric Human-AI pipeline that synergizes data filtering, augmentation, and selection to improve data quality. We then used README as the training data for models and leveraged a Retrieval-Augmented Generation method to reduce hallucinations and improve the quality of model outputs. Our extensive automatic and human evaluations demonstrate that open-source mobile-friendly models, when fine-tuned with high-quality data, are capable of matching or even surpassing the performance of state-of-the-art closed-source large language models like ChatGPT. This research represents a significant stride in closing the knowledge gap in patient education and advancing patient-centric healthcare solutions .

Identifiers

PMID41710550
PMCPMC12912280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.